Anarchist Black Cat

a new world in our hearts
 

It is currently Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:38 am


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
Offline
 Post subject: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:12 am 
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:04 am
Posts: 182
Just a little notice that I've begun my coverage of the strike(s) against Vale Inco over at Molly's Blog http://mollymew.blogspot.com . Also to say that the strikers have set up their own website to give their point of view ie Fair Deal Now http://www.FairDealNow.ca .
It's ain't too often that you get a second chance, but I hope the Ontario comrades will beat the Trots off the mark this time. There's lots to write about, and much to comment on. You may not agree with my own particular spin, but hopefully it will be commented on from your own point of view. As Phebus made plain you really and truly don't have to be an academic to comment.
Workers at Voisey's Bay in Newfoundland may be joining the strike in the next few weeks. As to here in Manitoba the USW contract doesn't expire until 2011, so there's little that will happen out here.


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:54 pm 
Common Cause
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:01 am
Posts: 389
Location: Hamilton, ON - Underdog City
Union membership: CUPE
Also a member of: IWW
We're trying to get our contacts out in Sudbury to cover this. And they're not academics :wink:

But beyond this, we're not in a position to send members up there to cover the story


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:08 pm 
Common Cause
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:05 pm
Posts: 770
Location: Toronto, Canada
Union membership: IWW
Briefly: Personal Capacity
Got this from one of my contacts in the labour movement;

Quote:
USW and Brazilian Union CUT Join Forces to Support Vale Workers

TORONTO, July 22 /CNW/ - Last Friday, Artur Henrique da Silva Santos,
President of the CUT Brazil, and Leo W. Gerard, International President of the
United Steelworkers (USW), the largest industrial union in North America
formed a strategic partnership to support workers in their negotiations with
the Brazilian multinational Vale. The main objective is the renewal of
collective agreements in Canada and Brazil.

After months of negotiation, Vale refuses to renew contract provisions
covering retirement and other benefits that were part of the agreements for
more than 20 years. The workers in Canada rejected the company's demands and
went on strike on July 13. The two idled Canadian sites are Sudbury and Port
Colborne, and employ some 4,600 workers. The Brazilian workers organized in
the Vale Union Network, part of nearly 150,000 Vale employees in 35 countries
in five continents, are extremely concerned about the fate of the negotiations
in Canada, since the outcome could have an immediate impact in the renewal of
the collective agreement in Brazil.

"The growing international support for the Canadian Vale Inco workers
sends a strong message regarding the importance of this fight," said Ken
Neumann, United Steelworkers National Director of Canada.

"With the current international financial crisis, workers don't need to
pay for a crisis they didn't create," said Artur. The unions of Vale Network
related to the CUT Brazil and other unions demand that the company immediately
returns to negotiations in Canada, and submits an acceptable proposal to the
workers. "A multinational that has $22 Billion of cash flow, and shows a $13.2
Billion in profits in 2008, while supposedly caring for its image as socially
responsible company, doesn't need to squeeze workers and their communities,"
said Arthur. Six high-level executives earned $33 million in 2008 and had
their pay increased more than 120% between 2006 and 2008, added Arthur. To
support this fight the CUT and the USW have signed a Solidarity Agreement and
are organizing an international campaign to be launched at the 10th Concut
(CUT's Congress). Trade unionists from several countries where Vale has
operations have committed to attend. The unions will also include the fight of
Vale's workers in the National Day of Struggle on August 14th 2009 and promote
actions of solidarity in Brazil, Canada and other countries.


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:08 am 
Common Cause
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:01 am
Posts: 389
Location: Hamilton, ON - Underdog City
Union membership: CUPE
Also a member of: IWW
We have a new article on the Vale Inco strike up on Linchpin.ca

Quote:
More than 3300 employees of mining giant Vale Inco are on strike in Sudbury, Ontario, and in other Canadian communities to defend decades' worth of gains. Beyond that, the strike by members of Locals 6500 and 6200 of the United Steel Workers of America also raise important questions about how unions orient themselves towards their communities and towards the nation-states in which their members live.


Continue reading at http://www.linchpin.ca/content/left/Nic ... ationalism


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:02 pm 
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:04 am
Posts: 182
unwagedworkerist wrote:
We have a new article on the Vale Inco strike up on Linchpin.ca

Quote:
More than 3300 employees of mining giant Vale Inco are on strike in Sudbury, Ontario, and in other Canadian communities to defend decades' worth of gains. Beyond that, the strike by members of Locals 6500 and 6200 of the United Steel Workers of America also raise important questions about how unions orient themselves towards their communities and towards the nation-states in which their members live.


Continue reading at http://www.linchpin.ca/content/left/Nic ... ationalism

Good stuff and well done. The article has been duly reprinted over at Molly's Blog. Keep it up.


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:46 pm 
Common Cause
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:01 am
Posts: 389
Location: Hamilton, ON - Underdog City
Union membership: CUPE
Also a member of: IWW
Thanks Molly. We are fortunate to have quality writers willing to help us out in places where we don't yet have members.


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:07 pm 
Common Cause
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:01 am
Posts: 389
Location: Hamilton, ON - Underdog City
Union membership: CUPE
Also a member of: IWW
From Molly's Blog. I hope you don't mind Molly. I thought this might start a discussion:

Quote:
It is, of course, disturbing that the Steelworkers initially adopted a very nationalist tone in their statements, especially considering that this is hardly the first strike against Inco and that the company was just as rapacious when it was Canadian owned. Personally, however, I think I detect a softening of this attitude as the fact of international solidarity on the part of workers from Brazil has become more prominent. The Steelworkers are actually party to international agreements with unions in countries other than Brazil that call for mutual support in disputes in one country or the other. As to expecting the Canadian government to do anything, not just in terms of the present Harperites but even with Iggy at the helm- well that is a forlorn hope. Personally I think that the nationalist tone will recede even further as the strike goes on. It's unrealistic. What was even more unrealistic, in my opinion, were pronouncements by the union at the beginning of the strike that it would be short because Vale Inco's stockpiles of nickel were low. That little piece of optimism has flowed under the bridge and is already halfway to Hudson's Bay. As to the previous actions of the Steelworkers, well this strike will hopefully be a learning experience for the membership if not necessarily for the leadership. At least one public service union has already joined the Steelworkers on the picket lines. Such an example will hopefully be remembered and repaid in the future.


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:46 pm 
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:28 pm
Posts: 248
So is 1966 Sudbury Inco wildcat irrelevant or just irrelevant to the purpose of the Linchpin article? Why is a strike under more progressive union bureaucrat leadership more relevant than a strike under workers' self-organized leadership?

Quote:
...wildcats often got even wilder as pent-up frustrations exploded in violence. The largest wildcat in the 1965-6 upsurge, the illegal walkout of thousands of Inco workers, was a key case in point. Workers in the Sudbury region had a long history of militancy, having fought a lengthy 119-day strike against the company in 1958. It ended badly, and to complicate matters union relations were embittered by a violent jurisdictional battle that pitted the communist-led International Mine, Mill, and Smelter Workers Union against the United Steelworkers of America (USWA). The latter was successful in wrestling control of the huge Sudbury-area membership away from one of the few radical holdouts in postwar trade unionism. Some Inco workers' memories were nevertheless long in their recollection of the USWA's misdeeds. As contract negotiations faltered in the summer of 1966, the wildcat spread from one operation to another and eventually, outside of all official union control, it took on the trappings of a 'wartime military machine.' Illegal strikers used 'walkie-talkies' to communicate and threatened to disable a transport helicopter Inco was using to get supervisory personnel into company facilities. With provincial police appearing on the scene, the wildcatters armed themselves with lengths of pipe, baseball bats, steel bars, and ominous clubs. Roads were blockaded, hydro and telephone lines sabotaged, and a supply truck en route to the plant was stopped, overturned, and rolled down a hill. Shipments of nickel to the United States were stopped dead in their tracks. The Toronto Telegram reported that some pickets carried shot guns and were prepared 'to take on all comers.' One Steelworker official confessed his wonderment at the wildness: 'I saw the Molotov cocktails, the guns, and the dynamite. The union lost control of the situation. Eventually we took truckloads of arms of one kind or another away from the picket lines.' When a settlement was finally reached, and the dissident wildcatters tamed, worker discontent was barely assuaged by the company's wage concessions, which saw increases of almost 30 per cent for skilled tradesmen, a bonus of five-week vacations on top of regular holiday time for all workers with half a decade of service under their belts, and greatly enhanced indemnity benefits for those unable to work because of sickness or accident.

- Bryan Palmer, Canada's 1960s, pp. 226, 231


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:38 am 
Common Cause
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:01 am
Posts: 389
Location: Hamilton, ON - Underdog City
Union membership: CUPE
Also a member of: IWW
If I get your question, you want to know why the 1977-78 strike was mentioned but not the 1966 wildcat strike. I can't read the authors mind but I suspect probably because the author was trying to make a point that since 1978, the leadership of the union has become more conservative. It is likely that neither the 77-78 nor the 66' strikes have much direct relevance for the current strike. Hence the only reason to mention the last major strike is because it marks a transition in the politics of the union leadership.

I'm not sure why the 1966 strike would need to be mentioned in this article. For a historical background type article, that's a different story.


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:57 am 
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:04 am
Posts: 182
Also consider the fact that, if somebody was 20 years old in 1966 he would now be 63 years old. The working life of miners happens to be less than 40 years for various reasons. How many people have been at Inco for 40 years ? It would be "great" if there were more wildcat strikes today that union leasdership would feel that they ere obliged to catch up to. The reality, however, is that there are likely to be fewer such things in tough times, and the conflict that some hope for between union membership abnd union leadership comes latter at the "sell-out" phase rather than at the beginning of a strike. I also think, though I may be wrong on this, that it is presently easier for a vote of a local union membership to declare a strike today than it was in 1966. The union bureaucracy is now required to respond to a lot more items than they used to.




As to the international aspects of the strike I have recently commented over at Molly's Blog (http://mollymew.blogspot.com ) about how such "internationalism" is easily transformed into faith in international social democracy, with all that that iimplies.No, "internationalism' is definitely no magic bulet".


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 4:09 pm 
Common Cause
 E-mail  Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:01 am
Posts: 389
Location: Hamilton, ON - Underdog City
Union membership: CUPE
Also a member of: IWW
I agree with Molly about the "internationalism" being no magic bullet. The international trade union organizations and most trade unions operating at that level seek a social partnership with capital and the state at the global level. See the big fuss over the "Decent Work" campaign. The content of internationalism is what matters.

This is off topic but it's important to recognize that the established trade unions are no longer the only ones practicing labour internationalism. There a dissident unions active around a "Proposal for a Labour Network" at the World Social Forum. And all kinds of other non-traditional worker organizations are active too (migrant worker orgs., fishworkers, taxi drivers, women workers etc.)

Unions like the USW need to do two things: link up with other unions in the same global industry, and link up with other movements and unorganized workers locally and internationally. It is far more likely they will do just the first and then only temporarily because doing the second means radically chaning the identity and structure of the union.


Top
 

Offline
 Post subject: Re: Strike Against Vale Inco
PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:32 pm 
Supports Anarkismo Statement
User avatar
 E-mail  WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:28 am
Posts: 294
Location: The Forks of the Red and Assiniboine, The Great Plains, Northern Turtle Island
Union membership: IWW
Briefly: Anti-Thesis to Jim Crutchfield
What is most relevant to the issue at hand is the fact that in 2000-2001 Workers in either Norway? or Finland? refused to process SCAB core that was mined from the Falconbridge mine when it was on strike just outside Sudbury, that the Vale INCO workers need this type of solidarity. Solidarity strikes globally by other inco workers were very important. Falconbridge is organized by CAW MineMill and historically more militant in Sudbury.


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits