I know a good few Irish anarchists are reading 'Lost Revolution' at the moment which is a just published history of the Official IRA and the Workers Party. Its a very significant history of what was the most significant organistion on the Irish left for a couple of key decades so I thought it may make for a good discussion thread. We have at least one ex member on the board as well as ex members of some of the other orgs and I'll try and encourage some more participation if the thread takes off.
I'm about 340 pages in and there are 3 different mentions directly concerning anarchists
- the involvement of a unnamed anarchist group with OIRA in the forging of building site tax certificates (p230) which remained a significant source of income
- the Murrays who accidentally killed a cop which escaping after a fundraising operation and were sentenced to death, the sentence was commuted to life after a defence campaign and they ended up being the longest serving political prisoners in the south until their release in the 1990's. They are not identified as anarchists in the text, just as ex OIRA (p309, 330)
- current WSM member Alan MacS gets a mention on page 304 for his (1975?) resignation letter saying that the new policies were not compatible with his "libertarian communist views". Alan posts here sometimes.
I'm at p340 at the moment, if there are any other similar mentions I'll flag them here.
The book launch is blogged at
http://anarchism.pageabode.com/andrewnf ... kers-party the audio at the end of the blog is quite a useful introduction to the text
I intend to do a review but quick impressions so far is that this is an exhaustive history although some key incidents have been (delibretely) skimmed over. The best example being the shooting dead of Seamus Costello (p347) which is covered in one paragraph without comment on the SFWP statement denying the shooting. Apparently an early review has criticised the lack of analysis in the book (Hanley referred to this in his talk at the launch and explained it on the grounds of 'how could me and Scott agree on anything'). So far this is just a very detailed telling of the story.
Anyway interested in the impressions of others who are reading the book, I know there are a lot of you out there